Log in  |  Register   3/20/2010

Not to our health

Existing gov’t plans rife with quackery

By Deroy Murdock
Saturday, November 21, 2009 -
EmailE-mail   PrintablePrint   Comments(6) Comments   LargerSmallerText size  Bookmark and Share Share  

As the Senate weighs a 2,074-page health care “reform” bill, supporters of a government option for medical coverage consider this the finest federal initiative since the Emancipation Proclamation. Yet today’s headlines show government severely bungling its current health care duties. Expanding Uncle Sam’s medical portfolio is a prescription for fraud, fiscal incompetence and mismanagement on the clinical front lines.

Fraud devours some $60 billion - or 13.3 percent - of Medicare’s $452 billion budget. “Rather than stealing $100,000 or $200,000,” federal prosecutor Kirk Ogrosky said last month on “60 Minutes,” criminals “can steal $100 million.”

+ Return to full article
Comments (6)
Sort:
 
johnson
  ?   +4 Good Comment -1 Poor Comment

This Health Care bill has nothing to do with improving health care or reducing costs but has everything to do with the Democrats repaying those who supported them. The fact that they are going to shove it up our collective behind is immaterial. what they aren't telling you is that it is only revenue neutral until 2017 when they expect that Obama, Reid, and Pelosi will be out of office. As Reid, Pelosi, and Obama have been saying, since November of last year, '...we won so shut up and bend over, we're driving now!'
 
Posted 4 months ago  Reply  Link Abusive
censored
  ?   +1 Good Comment -2 Poor Comment

What do you suspect ..ok history lesson...from Caligula and his Praetorian Guard .
 
Posted 4 months ago  Reply  Link Abusive
rm
  ?   +3 Good Comment -1 Poor Comment

Welcome to the "Health Care Tax Enhancement Act" of 2009.

This is nothing more than subterfuge for the government to raise taxes substantially on those of us who are not FRIENDS of the Democrats.

I just hope enough people realize they are not the friends they thought they were... in time
 
Posted 4 months ago  Reply  Link Abusive
MHammer
  ?   +1 Good Comment 0 Poor Comment

Sen. Chris Dodd of CT is quoted today as saying the Harry Reid bill is a bad bill, but a bad bill is better than "no bill." He said doing nothing is not an option. Why? We all know rising costs are a problem, but this bill does nothing to control costs. There are many things that can be done on health care, all one step at a time. In this case, no bill is infinitely better than a bad bill. What does Sen. John Kerry say?
 
Posted 4 months ago  Reply  Link Abusive
aidan replying to MHammer
  ?   0 Good Comment 0 Poor Comment

Sen John Kerry says "Don't they know who she is...she's Alexandra Forbes Kerry...and she wasn't drunk!!"
 
Posted 4 months ago  Reply  Link Abusive
PetePatriot
  ?   0 Good Comment 0 Poor Comment

45 years ago, 60 billion would have been half of total federal outlays. They might have cared about it then. Now, anything less than a billion dollars is treated like a rounding error or chump change even though that is serious money even for Mrs. Kerry. This cavalier attitude is particularly galling when contrasted with the attitude of the IRS which is willing to ruin your life over a few thousand bucks.

It's too bad the government doesn't audit themselves the way they audit citizens. They lose billions of dollars all over the place. Is it any wonder why Washington grows and grows. Everyone flocks there to get a piece of the 4 trillion dollar federal pie. Disrespect for the government flourishes as all they do is try to spend more and more money when they are out of money.
 
Posted 4 months ago  Reply  Link Abusive
« Previous  1  Next »

Join the BostonHerald.com community

Registration will help us improve the quality of our comments by keeping them on subject and in accordance with our guidelines.

To activate your account, simply complete the short form below and BostonHerald.com will send you a confirmation link to your e-mail.

Only fields marked with asterisk ( * ) are required.

Your Comments: * 
E-mail (must be real)   * 
Username   *  No spaces or special characters please
Password   *  Your password will be case sensitive
Re-enter Password   *   
Gender MaleFemale  
Year of birth  
Zip code  
PLEASE NOTE: If you would like your comments printed in the Opinion section of the newspaper, please provide your full name, location, and telephone number for verification
Full Name:
Phone: - -  
City/State: ,  
  or Sign-In  
Talk back at deroy.murdock@gmail.com.
Advertisement

Related Articles

Cost cutting elusive

If Massachusetts is indeed providing a microcosmic look at what happens when health...

Some ‘sweetener’!

As if dealing with a bill affecting more than 16 percent of the nation’s economy...

Deem Dems deceitful

WASHINGTON - It is bad enough to have proposed legislation worth at least a trillion...
Advertisement



Contact us  |   Print advertising  |   Online advertising  |   Herald history  |   News tips  |   Electronic edition  |   Browser upgrade  |   Home delivery  |   Herald wireless

$ave on Boston Herald Home Delivery

Jobs with Herald Media

For back copy information and more information on other collectible copies please call 617-426-3000 Ext. 7714.  Click here for Celtics, Patriots and Red Sox back copies

N.I.E. Smart Edition Mass Literacy Foundation